You were had by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld." But, of course, it wasn't just the troops who were had. Almost the entire American public, vociferously misinformed by a supposedly "liberal" but actually right-of-center media establishment, believed the administration's obvious lies. The rest of the developed world, not anti-American but simply better informed, was not taken. Couple this non-revelation with Alan Greenspan's admission, last fall, that "the Iraq war is largely about oil," and we are at last enabled, by the most impeccable of conservative testimony, to discuss the war and the Bush Administration for what it really is. But, of course, neither of these stories has received or will receive more than a few lines, a few moments' attention on the major networks and cable news shows, or in the campaign speeches of "realist" John McCain or "liberal" Clinton. We refuse to know what we know, so we can avoid the unpleasantness of admitting we've done what we've done...
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Pentagon: There Was No Saddam/Al Qaeda Link
The obvious has been confirmed. So, if I may quote the absolutely necessary Juan Cole, "Now who will tell the US troops who marched into Iraq in 2003 with pictures of the World Trade Towers pinned to their backpacks? Ooops, guys, sorry. 
You were had by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld." But, of course, it wasn't just the troops who were had. Almost the entire American public, vociferously misinformed by a supposedly "liberal" but actually right-of-center media establishment, believed the administration's obvious lies. The rest of the developed world, not anti-American but simply better informed, was not taken. Couple this non-revelation with Alan Greenspan's admission, last fall, that "the Iraq war is largely about oil," and we are at last enabled, by the most impeccable of conservative testimony, to discuss the war and the Bush Administration for what it really is. But, of course, neither of these stories has received or will receive more than a few lines, a few moments' attention on the major networks and cable news shows, or in the campaign speeches of "realist" John McCain or "liberal" Clinton. We refuse to know what we know, so we can avoid the unpleasantness of admitting we've done what we've done...
You were had by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld." But, of course, it wasn't just the troops who were had. Almost the entire American public, vociferously misinformed by a supposedly "liberal" but actually right-of-center media establishment, believed the administration's obvious lies. The rest of the developed world, not anti-American but simply better informed, was not taken. Couple this non-revelation with Alan Greenspan's admission, last fall, that "the Iraq war is largely about oil," and we are at last enabled, by the most impeccable of conservative testimony, to discuss the war and the Bush Administration for what it really is. But, of course, neither of these stories has received or will receive more than a few lines, a few moments' attention on the major networks and cable news shows, or in the campaign speeches of "realist" John McCain or "liberal" Clinton. We refuse to know what we know, so we can avoid the unpleasantness of admitting we've done what we've done...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Concerning the power of presidential speech...
(From my Facebook page ...) The world is being led to the brink of nuclear war by a commander-in-chief whose idea of diplomacy is tweeti...
-
(Jan. 19 update: This protest has now appeared in regional papers including the Valley News and Keene (N.H.) Sentinel. Thanks , VN, for perm...
-
A lot of people see the filibuster as another antique oddity, like the Electoral College -- or your appendix -- that ought to come o...
-
Walt Whitman used to write his own reviews of Leaves of Grass , anonymously praising his own transcendent, vigorous style as proof t...
No comments:
Post a Comment